Former Gorsuch Colleagues to Testify 03/23 06:08
WASHINGTON (AP) -- Lawyers, advocacy groups and former colleagues get their
say on President Donald Trump's Supreme Court nominee after Judge Neil Gorsuch
emerged unscathed from two days of tough questioning at his confirmation
Assured of support from majority Republicans, Gorsuch received glowing GOP
reviews but complaints from frustrated Democrats that he concealed his views
from the American public. Gorsuch, a federal appeals court judge in Denver,
refused repeated attempts to get him to talk about key legal and political
issues of the day. But he did tell Sen. Dianne Feinstein, who worried that
Gorsuch would vote to restrict abortion, that "no one is looking to return us
to horse and buggy days."
On Thursday, the panel will hear from the American Bar Association, which
has already given him a unanimous "well qualified" rating, along with former
colleagues and judges supporting him and advocacy groups like the Human Rights
Campaign that have opposed him.
After the hearing, the Judiciary panel is expected to vote in the next two
weeks to recommend Gorsuch favorably to the full Senate. Though Gorsuch is
expected to eventually be confirmed, the process on the Senate floor is less
Some Democrats have already said they want to try and block the nomination.
That means Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., will have to round up
60 votes to proceed to a confirmation vote, including eight Democrats.
It's unclear if he will have those votes. Democrats Jeff Merkley of Oregon,
Kirsten Gillibrand of New York, Sherrod Brown of Ohio, Tammy Baldwin of
Wisconsin, Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts and Ed Markey of Massachusetts
have declared their opposition.
Most Democrats have said they will decide when the hearings are over. Sen.
Bob Casey, a Democrat up for re-election in Pennsylvania next year, said he
will announce his decision Thursday morning.
No Democrat has yet pledged to support the judge, but Sen. Joe Manchin of
West Virginia said Wednesday he is open to voting for him. McConnell could also
change Senate rules to confirm Gorsuch with a simple majority in the 100-member
body, and appears prepared to take that step if necessary.
Gorsuch didn't give those looking for more information much to go on. Every
time Democrats tried to draw him out on a range of serious issues, including
abortion and gay rights, Gorsuch answered in the same way: "I have declined to
offer any promises, hints or previews of how I'd resolve any case."
Illinois Sen. Dick Durbin, a member of the Judiciary panel, said during a
hearing break that Gorsuch may have convinced "some, but not many" of his
fellow Democrats to vote for him.
Feinstein, the committee's senior Democrat, summed up her colleagues'
frustration. "What worries me is you have been very much able to avoid any
specificity like no one I have ever seen before," Feinstein told Gorsuch. "And
maybe that's a virtue, I don't know. But for us on this side, knowing where you
stand on major questions of the day is really important to a vote 'aye,' and so
that's why we pressed and pressed."
Republicans, on the other hand, couldn't get enough of the Colorado native.
Sen. Orrin Hatch said he hadn't seen a better nominee in 40 years in the Senate.
The Supreme Court itself threw one surprise Gorsuch's way when it ruled
unanimously Wednesday in a case involving learning-disabled students,
overturning a standard for special education that Gorsuch had endorsed in an
earlier case on the same topic.
The decision prompted sharp questioning from committee Democrats.
"Why in your early decision did you want to lower the bar so low?" Durbin
Gorsuch said he was bound by an even earlier decision on the 10th U.S.
Circuit Court of Appeals and said that any implication that he was against
autistic children was "heartbreaking."
"I was wrong senator, I was wrong because I was bound by circuit-court
precedent," Gorsuch said. "And I'm sorry."